> Le 7 févr. 2015 à 13:20, Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceule...@computer.org> a écrit : > > On 07/02/15 10:29, Rob wrote: >> I presume you meant this followup to the "multi PPS sources to a single >> system" and then it is not true either, of course our systems have >> at least 4 cores and they can service multiple interrupts at the same >> time. > > On a single-core system I'd invert one of the PPS signals and then > appropriately fudge the offset so that the two interrupts do not compete > with each other.
Another possibility in a single cored system would be to configure 1PPS pulse delays. Ublox 6,7,8 and other receivers such at Motorola VP,UT+,M12+T, Trimble Resolution, Res.SMT etc, have this possibility. Then fudge that offset in NTP. > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > questions@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
