Thank you very much for doing this research, Sebastian. We value your results and let me digest them and will come back to you. cj
________________________________ From: EToSat <[email protected]> on behalf of Sebastian Endres <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 3:38 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [EToSat] Interop runner with satellite links **EXTERNAL EMAIL** Dear all, for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available QUIC implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are available online: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://interop.sedrubal.de/__;!!Emaut56SYw!mdwY2w6Rv2GsQxL8LcMLshk763UZDJU-VnBlS8og3OMCzPRPhcHtxjl8Wxq31WudkA$ A click on the results also shows time-offset plots, but are not available for every combination. In general, the performance of QUIC over high latency (e.g., geostationary satellites) is rather poor, especially if there is packet loss. Would it make sense to add such tests with challenging link characteristics to the official QUIC interop runner? Best regards, Sebastian _______________________________________________ EToSat mailing list [email protected] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat__;!!Emaut56SYw!mdwY2w6Rv2GsQxL8LcMLshk763UZDJU-VnBlS8og3OMCzPRPhcHtxjl8WxpEWrdBTA$
