Hi Sebastian,

Thanks for the great work.
Some comments/questions.

  *   Sec. IV,D, 5: Interesting to know "picoquic" does speculative 
retransmission. As you argue, this may not always help. Did you confirm with 
the author?
  *    The results show loss-based CC does not perform well compared to BBR
  *   Production software performs well more like picoquic or not ?
     *   how big difference is between production vs these implementations in 
the test?
  *   Any Time-Offset graphs for EUTELSAT case ?
  *   Research overview page: additional column on emulated or real Sat link 
will be helpful

Good useful work.
thanks.
cj
________________________________
From: QUIC <[email protected]> on behalf of Sebastian Endres 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 7:02 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] Interop runner with satellite links

**EXTERNAL EMAIL**

Dear all,

we've published a pre-print of our paper in which we present the 
QUIC-Interop-runner extended to include satellite scenarios and our measurement 
results using numerous publicly available QUIC implementations:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08228__;!!Emaut56SYw!mFvp0jheUG95wMrw7L6ZHr3AUjZZgp63MEXhAZnEYvwEkQITw9uIFauoKkW-JRj-Kg$

Best regards,

Sebastian

On Mittwoch, 29. September 2021 21:38:05 CET Sebastian Endres wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available QUIC 
> implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are available 
> online: 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://interop.sedrubal.de/__;!!Emaut56SYw!mFvp0jheUG95wMrw7L6ZHr3AUjZZgp63MEXhAZnEYvwEkQITw9uIFauoKkUlf0EgaQ$
>
> A click on the results also shows time-offset plots, but are not available 
> for every combination.
>
> In general, the performance of QUIC over high latency (e.g., geostationary 
> satellites) is rather poor, especially if there is packet loss.
>
> Would it make sense to add such tests with challenging link characteristics 
> to the official QUIC interop runner?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EToSat mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat__;!!Emaut56SYw!mFvp0jheUG95wMrw7L6ZHr3AUjZZgp63MEXhAZnEYvwEkQITw9uIFauoKkXTZO8rhQ$
>


Reply via email to