Dear all, we've published a pre-print of our paper in which we present the QUIC-Interop-runner extended to include satellite scenarios and our measurement results using numerous publicly available QUIC implementations:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08228 Best regards, Sebastian On Mittwoch, 29. September 2021 21:38:05 CET Sebastian Endres wrote: > Dear all, > > for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available QUIC > implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are available > online: https://interop.sedrubal.de/ > > A click on the results also shows time-offset plots, but are not available > for every combination. > > In general, the performance of QUIC over high latency (e.g., geostationary > satellites) is rather poor, especially if there is packet loss. > > Would it make sense to add such tests with challenging link characteristics > to the official QUIC interop runner? > > Best regards, > > Sebastian > > > _______________________________________________ > EToSat mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat >
