Hi Lucas & Matt, On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 06:11:08AM +0100, Lucas Pardue wrote: > Hi folks, > > At last week's interim meeting, the emerging sense of the room was that the > QUIC WG is the right place for work on adapting QUIC streams to a secure, > reliable, and bidirectional byte stream substrate. We spent time during the > session discussion the charter change(s) that might be required to do so; > balanced against the use cases, requirements and some of the _possible_ > solution space. > > During the meeting we started to hone some proposed charter text. In order to > refine and finalize the charter change proposal, as per our usual processes > for iterating on text ,I have opened a PR against the current QUIC WG charter > https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/pull/240. > > This change is presently proposed as a new paragraph at the end of the > charter text. Another option would be to append it to the existing bullet > point list of work areas, as a new fourth area. > > Comments, questions, or suggestions specific to the text are welcome on the > PR. If you have comments, support or objection to the higher-level topic of > rechartering, please respond to this thread. We are looking to get this > finalized and in a state where we have something ready to take forward > through the formal process steps. So lets target a two week feedback period > closing on 2025-06-23 anywhere on earth [1].
Thanks for posting this. This looks good to me and seems to reflect the final state of the discussion in the meeting. As you proposed to add a 4th bullet point to the list, and we didn't easily find which existing one to amend, I now tend to think that indeed a 4th point would totally make sense. In any case, that's a +1 from me. Cheers, Willy
