Morgen Andreas, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Thursday 26 January 2006 23:11, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >>Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >>>On Thursday 26 January 2006 21:40, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >>> >>>>Better... but there is still something going on that I don't understand >>>>:-( >>> >>>Huh? What does this give you? >>> >>> $ diff -u <(echo "1") <(echo "2") >> >>Nothing at all! :-o > > That's not nice. We don't use <(...) too often though, so we might be able to > replace it. > > What does this get you? > > $ echo <(echo foo) <(echo bar)
$ echo <(echo foo) <(echo bar)
/dev/fd/63 /dev/fd/62
or did you mean:
$ cat <(echo foo) <(echo bar)
foo
bar
I have spent too long in portable-sh land I think... I've never used (or
seen) this syntax before :-(
HTH,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
