Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Friday 27 January 2006 01:52, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >>> What does this get you? >>> >>> $ echo <(echo foo) <(echo bar) >> $ echo <(echo foo) <(echo bar) >> /dev/fd/63 /dev/fd/62 >> >> or did you mean: >> >> $ cat <(echo foo) <(echo bar) >> foo >> bar > > I really did mean echo to see if <(...) does something useful at all on that > box, but it's interesting to see that other than diff, cat succeeds. So it's > a diff bug on that platform most likely. You could try debugging it with > strace / ltrace / truss (maybe swapping the diff arguments), > > $ echo foo > foo > $ strace diff foo <(echo bar) > > but I don't think that knowing why this diff is broken would help us. We > didn't rely on <(...) very much, so I've replaced it where we have been using > it.
Agreed. Thanks, your replacement works fine for me :-D
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
