That's nice to know. In fact I've heard people tell me that they just
started with Reaper or Sonar, or some other accessible DAW, then start using
QWS for more functions. I was the opposite, in fact it's still the only midi
software I use besides XM play just for midi playback when I've finished.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Olesen" <[email protected]>
To: "QWS list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: QWS List is QWS harder to use than most midi applications?
Hi,
QWS is a fantastic easy to use midi sequencer.
Today I use Sonar for almost all my work, but QWS has all you need, for
most midi stuff.
Brian
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
From: Leonard de Ruijter
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:43 PM
To: QWS list
Subject: Re: QWS List is QWS harder to use than most midi applications?
Hey Raymond,
I have to say that qws seemed quite complicated to me when i started
working with it. Another thing, which is a big credit to Andre, as
soon as i started listening to some of his tutorials, i found qws
getting more and more interesting for me, and understood more of
it. For example, i've played with note transform for several days
after i listened andre's tutorial concerning this. I use qws for every
sequencing work i have to do now, and it works great. Lots of
functions qws has i miss in daws, for example the quick note editing
and midi assignments. So may be it's an idea to point
the daw-lovers to Andre's tutorials. One remark i also have to make
is that some of my sighted friends found qws quite scary as well, but
that's more about how they found it look like, and as it is mainly
used by blind musicians, i don't care.
--
Regards,
Leonard de Ruijter
Playing in the dark
Sunday, August 7, 2011, 9:56:04 PM, you wrote:
Hi all,
Here's an interesting question. When I learned QWS, I didn't
have anyone to help me out with it, just the setting up the keyboard
part. And I had to learn most of the tools and functions myself.
While I am a decent musician, I don't consider myself better than
everyone. But QWS just came natural to me, a little more than I had
expected. There are sighted people I know that know way more than I
do, who use other programs which are not at all accessible. They
have a whole workstation in front of them, and they can do way more
than impport midi data and play it back, they can tweak pretty much
every synth and effect peramitor there is. Whether they actually
know the ins and outs of it I don't know, but it sure seems like
they do.
Now the question. I know people who are impressed with the work
I do, contrary to my opinion, lol. but, they wanted to know how I
did it, but they're sort of geared into something like I said above
and I'm not sure exactly how to approach QWs. I initially said,
"The manual's really good, you should understand it." I was under
the impression that QWS's features were pretty familiar to any midi
sequencer that knows what they're doing, and it would be
ridiculously simple. But then an hour later they'd uninstall because
it was either too complicated for them or too slow. I then realized
that QWS and a DAW are pretty different, QWS is like Notepad, where
it doesn't offer amazing functions with one clikc. You have to use
the thirty or so tools that it provides you, in the way you want
them, not go by some factory of presets already made for you and
tweak it from there.
So am I even partially right? Is QWS really complicated from
that standpoint, or could it be lack of patience? We've all seen
what Andre can do with it, I myself found it hard to believe that he
used QWS at first since I'm nowhere near that level.
Maybe some of you here have had similar experiences and can give more
insight.
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
