Same here.
On the topic of new features for the distant future, here's yet another
thought. If these new feature suggestions keep coming up, James might just
get overwhelmed...
Anyway, me and a few of my friends have been thinking about this for a
while. We're pretty much stuck with the onscreen keyboard because we're on
something very portible whether it be a netbook or laptop. The problem is,
it makes things like pitch bends, expression controls, and other things
difficult. I mostly use the progression tool for those. But, most of the
time I end up spending five minutes getting the notes right and two hours
pitch bending and adding expression to it. So I was thinking there could be
some on screen control surface. Your mouse could control things. You could
set what X and Y do, like what controller they change like the progression
tool does, and then use the mouse to control them in realtime. The only
thing you couldn't really use the mouse for is controling notes, as that is
done with the keyboard.
Of course that opens up a whole set of problems. The keyboard and the mouse
would have to be separate screens because you can only do one thing at a
time. There might have to be a sensitivity setting for the mouse, and maybe
a snap control could be put in like there is with the progression tool. But
I think it could work. I hope I haven't suggested something too outrageous.
I have no clue what key bindings are though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicole Massey" <[email protected]>
To: "QWS list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: QWS List A feature for the distant future
Well, since I have no idea what you're talking about, I would say that I
probably don't use them, though I may use them under a different name.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Steve Matzura
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:30 PM
To: QWS list
Subject: QWS List A feature for the distant future
Since it's been determined that only some synths, even unto the same
manufacturer, send bank and program-change data as such, and not as
system exclusive messages, and since it's been figured out that this
actually already does work the way I wanted it to, just not on the
same synth,
OK, one idea solved. Harumph to Roland for not making it work
everywhere.
But I've another idea. See how good I am at giving other people work
to do? HAAHAA!
How often do the rest of you QWS users use key bindings in other
software to perform program functions? That's something I've been very
into since Cakewalk 9 for DOS, and there are real times that I really
miss not having it in QWS. This is another one of those features for
which I would happily prepay to get James on his way toward
implementing.
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
