Re James getting overwhelmed, he can always just write them down, put them in a time capsule, bury it somewhere on his property, and when he's bored on a rainy day, dig up said time capsule, read our wish list of features, and have a good laugh! HEHHEHHEHHEH!
Seriously though, it's all grist for the mill, as they say. On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:21:25 -0500, you wrote: >Same here. >On the topic of new features for the distant future, here's yet another >thought. If these new feature suggestions keep coming up, James might just >get overwhelmed... >Anyway, me and a few of my friends have been thinking about this for a >while. We're pretty much stuck with the onscreen keyboard because we're on >something very portible whether it be a netbook or laptop. The problem is, >it makes things like pitch bends, expression controls, and other things >difficult. I mostly use the progression tool for those. But, most of the >time I end up spending five minutes getting the notes right and two hours >pitch bending and adding expression to it. So I was thinking there could be >some on screen control surface. Your mouse could control things. You could >set what X and Y do, like what controller they change like the progression >tool does, and then use the mouse to control them in realtime. The only >thing you couldn't really use the mouse for is controling notes, as that is >done with the keyboard. >Of course that opens up a whole set of problems. The keyboard and the mouse >would have to be separate screens because you can only do one thing at a >time. There might have to be a sensitivity setting for the mouse, and maybe >a snap control could be put in like there is with the progression tool. But >I think it could work. I hope I haven't suggested something too outrageous. >I have no clue what key bindings are though. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Nicole Massey" <[email protected]> >To: "QWS list" <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:39 PM >Subject: RE: QWS List A feature for the distant future > > >> Well, since I have no idea what you're talking about, I would say that I >> probably don't use them, though I may use them under a different name. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Steve Matzura >> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:30 PM >> To: QWS list >> Subject: QWS List A feature for the distant future >> >> Since it's been determined that only some synths, even unto the same >> manufacturer, send bank and program-change data as such, and not as >> system exclusive messages, and since it's been figured out that this >> actually already does work the way I wanted it to, just not on the >> same synth, >> >> OK, one idea solved. Harumph to Roland for not making it work >> everywhere. >> >> But I've another idea. See how good I am at giving other people work >> to do? HAAHAA! >> >> How often do the rest of you QWS users use key bindings in other >> software to perform program functions? That's something I've been very >> into since Cakewalk 9 for DOS, and there are real times that I really >> miss not having it in QWS. This is another one of those features for >> which I would happily prepay to get James on his way toward >> implementing. >> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >> >> for archived list posts, see >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >> >> for archived list posts, see >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > >To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com > >for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
