Seems to me, a veteran of sequencers good and bad, that this feature could be tweaked just a little bit and turned into what some of us used to know as patterns, then a pattern editor could string them all together in whatever order, including repeats, that is desired. I know, more work for our dear author, but hey, we need to fill his days with wondrous ideas, do we not?, chortle chortle?
On Sat, 4 May 2013 17:44:30 -0500, you wrote: >yes, you need to glide or move the data in the tracks or record a >segment with empty bars, say you record a segment that is 8 bars long, >and name that fragment1. Then you record the other segment that is 8 >bars and name it fragment2 . But this time, instead of starting to >record from bar 1, start to record from bar 9, this way when you use >that command it will be straightforward and easy, and then you can >combine tracks if you want so there is not a mess of tracks all over >the place. Youc an combine tracks by saving files as type 0 or format >0, and then use the channel split tool to make tracks only for the >instruments you need (since there are 16 channels in the midi >specification you can use just 16 different instruments) unless you >use 2 keyboards or several synths. > >2013/5/2, Terry Nord <[email protected]>: >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> I am trying to record a song in segments. I am naming them "abc1 abc2 >> abc3" >> etc. When I use the append feature and try to play two segments I have a >> mess. I thought when you append abc2 on to abc1 it would put abc2 on the >> end of abc1. Do I need to use the Move feature? >> >> >> >> Terry Nord >> >> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
