I'm quite new to this medical stuff. But my associates told me that we are not free in choice of Statistical Software because the FDA has high standards concerning this topic. But if they would prefer a specific package (like SAS) that could mean, that this package vendourer could lay back and hold it's hand open for licence money.
Is there any part of the ICH document referring to software packages? I really would use R for some tasks but therefor I need arguments... >"Antonia Drugica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Does anybody know if R is FDA or ICH (or EMEA...) compliant? AFAIK S-Plus >> is but that means nothing... > >As Thomas pointed out, that does mean nothing -- there was a group of >folks discussing what might be done to help, earlier this year, but >then everyone got busy... > >best, >-tony > >-- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ >Biomedical and Health Informatics University of Washington >Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center >UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable >FHCRC (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email > >CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachme...{{dropped}} > >______________________________________________ >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list >https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > -- Trebate bolji pristup internetu? Nazovite IskonInternet na 0800 1000 ili pogledajte http://www.iskon.biz/individualni/usluge/dialup/ ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help