On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Jon Wilson wrote: > Is it less silly if, for example, whether a sequence is increasing could > be changed from #f to #t by removing the last element?
Yes, it is definitely less silly, since this is what R6RS already allows, e.g., (< 1 2 3 2) ==> #f (< 1 2 3) ==> #t No-one would expect the property "NOT <" to be conserved under truncation of sequences. Andre _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
