Yes, my apologies. It was a thinko. Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Jon Wilson wrote: > >> On the other hand, take a decreasing sequence >> (< 4 3 2 1) >> (< 3 2 1) >> (< 3 2) >> (< 2) >> (<) >> all => #f? >> Is it less silly if, for example, whether a sequence is increasing could >> be changed from #f to #t by removing the last element? > > That's not silly at all. > > Take (< 1 2 3 4 5 -1000) which is #f, remove the last element, and you > get #t. > > Aziz,,,
_______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
