2009/8/24 Thomas Lord <[email protected]>: > Back in the day, when it was uphill to school in both > directions, people would sometimes write "modules" > like: > <snip> > > If you syntactically abstract that a bit > you get a perfectly nice standard for a module > system for small scheme.
Been there. Done that. It works great. You can make it even more fun by using lots of HOFs. And then you get to non-hygienic macros and it falls apart :( > (John C.: This half-answers (but enough?) your > request to flesh out my claim that a module system > can be just syntax.) I totally agree. david rush -- GPG Public key at http://cyber-rush.org/drr/gpg-public-key.txt _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
