On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 13:32 -0700, Nicholas "Indy" Ray wrote: > I'm not sure how that becomes "a perfectly nice standard for a module > system" It doesn't contain any of the nice properties of module > systems such as prefixing/renaming or being able to define exports at > the top level.
That rather depends on your mechanism for syntactic abstraction, doesn't it? I told you, hygiene is not high on my list of important features. (With a good macro systems, a hygenic macro system can be robustly and efficiently provided by a library!) > Kind of reminds me of those How to draw Donald Duck > books... Circle for the head, circle for the body, some for the > legs... and then some magic happens and Presto! now you have Donald > Duck! Yes, but you're strange that way :-) -t _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
