On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 13:33 -0700, Pavel Dudrenov wrote: > is that people would have a standard > minimalistic module system already provided, so, hopefully, no one > will have the urge to write their own module system as to better split > code for projects they are working on.
You can't grab power over future programmers that way. Don't even bother trying. And you shouldn't, anyway - it's rude. If small scheme has some anemic module system, don't act too surprised when people start writing their own replacements anyway. Just give people the essence which, in this matter, is just enough so that module system_s_ can be defined in SRFIs. We're already committed to some form of syntactic abstraction and lambda: there is nothing more to add to the *core* vis a vis modules. -t _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
