David Rush scripsit: > Well actually, after spending some time reading the Stalin source code > (and seeing how well it optimizes this kind of thing), I actually went > back to using lists of characters for a large number of string > algorithms. It really is a very graceful way to handle strings - > substring, insert, and delete all become *very* cheap. It's a paradigm > I'm quite sure that we ought to preserve.
Merging characters with single-codepoint strings would definitely not discard it. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
