On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:55:11PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > See SRFI 50, but be sure to read the discussion archive first.
I always thought it unfortunate that the SRFI process doesn't allow/require authors to provide a public statement with the reason for withdrawal. Instead, you have to go digging through the mail archives for the possible reason that the standard was withdrawn. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgpizc36DKwDM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
