On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > Some people say "things should be in the standard because they want to > be able to use them" (sockets etc). I agree, we need a standard way to > do sockets, but it needn't be in "core Scheme". It should be > standardised in an SRFI, or maybe in "large Scheme".
I am of the opinion that we don't need large Scheme at all. SRFIs should be sufficient, if the process is properly conducted. Large Scheme seems too heavyweight a process, and updates to it are likely to be too intermittent, to fulfill the growing and changing needs for useful libraries. Andre _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
