Aubrey Jaffer scripsit: > | Can we at least agree that a developer, having read the Thing One > | report, should be able to *use* the module system without making > | guesses as to how a particular implementation organizes it? R6RS > | failed to address finding standard modules in an installed system. > > That seems reasonable. Is that what (withdrawn) SRFI-83 was about?
No, that was R6RS library syntax. SRFI-55 does address it, as I noted in my earlier post. > Portable (pure Scheme) conversions to and from integer-encoded and > IEEE-754-encoded byte-vectors are provided by SLIB > <http://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/slib_7.html#SEC199>. That reminds me: I need to look through SRFI-96. I'll probably send some questions about it your way. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://ccil.org/~cowan [R]eversing the apostolic precept to be all things to all men, I usually [before Darwin] defended the tenability of the received doctrines, when I had to do with the [evolution]ists; and stood up for the possibility of [evolution] among the orthodox --thereby, no doubt, increasing an already current, but quite undeserved, reputation for needless combativeness. --T. H. Huxley _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
