On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Nicholas "Indy" Ray wrote: > I understand that on some systems you can't even assume a file system > exists. However I don't think this should prevent an average scheme > user trying to write portable code from being able to assume a fairly > standard module layout for systems with a standard file system.
In the R6 module system, for all its faults, no filenames appear in the syntax of a portable program or module. So I would say the problem of writing portable code is already solved in R6. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
