>>I'm confused. Isn't this the problem that modules are supposed to >>solve?
> Without a module system that forbids mutation of > bindings, you get a disaster where it's impossible to have [...] Are we having an argument here? We're both saying a module system should protect against the disasters. Is it the "that forbids mutation of bindings" part I'm not understanding? Does a module system have to forbid mutation of bindings within a module, or just to forbid such a mutation from affecting other modules? > The bottom line is that > this is very far from what I'd call "jewel-like". Well at least we've gotten you saying "jewel-like"! :-) _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
