On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Felix Klock (r6rs proxy) <[email protected]> wrote: > > (The hypothetical advantage with specifying a family of core > procedures atop which to build such a script, e.g. > (library-name->file-system-path lib), is that we might then see > community effort in coming up with different portable installation > scripts. But then again determining an appropriate core set of > procedures is probably an unreasonable task for WG1.)
In fact, on second thought, maybe this particular topic is better left to WG2 to address (with the assumption that implementations will look first to WG2's output for inspiration on what interface to provide to the end-user when it comes to subsystems like "how to install libraries"). Cheers, -Felix _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
