On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:23 AM, Brian Mastenbrook wrote: > I think it's clear to me at least that these terms are not > actually very good descriptions.
That's for sure. > Perhaps "eager expansion" and "lazy expansion" would be better terms? No. Let's not go there. "two-pass" is just "R6RS's". "one-pass" is just "Andre's" (since no one implements it anyways). Chicken's (what you described) is "chicken's" since no other implementation does it the same way. Aziz,,, _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
