On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Andre van Tonder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote: > >> "two-pass" is just "R6RS's". "one-pass" is just "Andre's" (since no one >> implements it anyways). > > I disagree. One-pass is implemented by many Schemes at the toplevel > or REPL, which is really what this discussion used to be about. > > The discussion of internal definitions has been a distraction from > the original point, which concerned what happens at the toplevel. > R6RS toplevel programs are not 1-pass, and are incompatible > with REPL execution, if that kind of thing is important to you. > A REPL will have 1-pass semantics if anything. >
I thought Brian Harvey was suggesting something like a spreadsheet semantics for scheme (including macro expansion). Lynn _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
