At Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:02:28 -0800 (PST), "alex.mclin" wrote: > Will Racket's internal optimizations be ported over to Chez backend > eventually? I frequently see traffic about work being done in on the > Racket's optimizer so it's apparent it's an active area of development. > Since Racket's semantics include immutable pairs, and Chez doesn't have > them, I imagine there are optimization opportunities only available when > immutable pairs are assumed. I do note that Chez's compiler is written in > Scheme so I figure it would be natural to modify the compiler code or fork > it to fold in Racket specifics.
I expect optimization work to start more or less afresh on Chez. We've built up some experience, and we can compare to what Chez already does --- and, just maybe, we'll be able to contribute some generally useful improvements to Chez in the long run. > Do you envision in the future exposing Chez' own debugging and inspection > tools to the Racket layer? Yes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/58a72dbc.0c85620a.42814.0fd0SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
