[Sorry for the delay. I just discovered that I forgot to hit "Send" here.]
At Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:13:59 +0000, Laurent wrote: > Do you expect the GUI part to cause any problem? I expect that to be relatively easy, because Racket's FFI looks enough like Chez's, but we'll see. > Apart from the rewriting, will Chez bring some new features to Racket? I hope that Chez's debugging and inspection facilities will quickly lead to better debugging tools for Racket. > And could Chez benefit from some of Racket's features? I can't help thinking that Racket *is* the benefit for Chez users. :) More directly, if we end up creating pull requests for the rare new feature that Racket needs from Chez, I hope those new features would be worthwhile for Chez users. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/58ac5531.8883620a.f8f19.b0b9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
