Definitely agreed with the moving more parts to racket. It makes things much more exiting and approachable. On Feb 19, 2017 5:45 AM, "Matthew Flatt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> At Sat, 18 Feb 2017 07:53:13 -0800 (PST), Adeoluwa Adejumo wrote: > > "The core Racket implementation relies on a lot of C code, and that's > > a problem for maintenance, for porting it to new platforms (say, > > JavaScript), and for improving performance. " > > > > not sure exactly how helpful this is but there is Nim programming > language > > https://nim-lang.org/docs/backends.html > > Thanks! I've heard of Nim, and a language like Nim or Rust might > conceivably we the way to go if it was just a matter of moving C code > to a better languages. But, of course, we want to generally move things > to Racket specifically. Meanwhile, Chez provides a temendous amount of > infrastructure that we need related to GC and compiling and running > code interactively. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/racket-dev/2BV3ElyfF8Y/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/racket-dev/58a8e3a1.1716620a.cb4c1.27cdSMTPIN_ > ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAAub%2BCf60OAQuQk68wkAvVy3HhBcVoWezQfY5oNLY_Z_pvNk1A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
