Wow, thanks for all the feedback, I'll try to get most of the mentioned stuff done and then post an update : )
> I teach trees and decision trees to freshman students who have never > programmed before, and Racket’s forms of data and functions are extremely > suitable to this domain. I think this is relating to using vectors and accessing them by index? How would you represent the data? What forms of data are better suited? Mentioned were: - struct instead of hash - list of vectors instead of vector of vectors Your post made me think of functions themselves. Would it be possible to represent the splits as chains of functions and would that have any advantage? Is that what you are hinting at? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
