At Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:14:47 +0200, Dexter Lagan wrote:
>   To the point: what would make Racket2 the ultimate tool (for me):
> Performance. Faster startup times, shorter execution times in general. 
> Optionally, a ‘lite’ version of Racket that compiles directly to no-deps 
> binaries, bypassing the JIT altogether, would be a game-changer. As far as 
> high levels languages with functional concepts and metaprogramming facilities 
> that compiles to tiny, fast bins, Nim comes dangerously close, but it’s not a 
> Lisp, and it’s not Racket.
> Production-quality, modern and fast GUI facilities. I’ll take properly 
> documented, complete Qt bindings. Racket/GUI is great for internal tools, but 
> it quickly becomes slow, tedious and limited for more complex client-facing 
> UIs.
> One complete, commercial-grade Web framework, inspired from Symphony or 
> Laravel. Security and ease of use first, continuations later.
> Better documentation: Racket docs are aesthetically very pleasing, complete 
> and detailed. However some parts are still very obscure and lacking simple 
> examples (if only the part about Continuations included just one basic 
> example, such as a ‘return’ implementation, on the very first page. If only 
> the Macros documentation started with define-simple-macro and a few very 
> basic, practical examples. Instead we’re greeted with pattern-based macros, 
> which although very powerful, are very hard to comprehend for newcomers).

Which of these things will you be working on?


>   I am well aware that what I’m wishing for isn’t necessarily compatible with 
> Racket’s intended public’s needs (comp-sci teachers and students? That’s the 
> impression I’m getting). But Racket is the most advanced general purpose 
> programming tool I’ve ever seen. Wouldn’t it be a shame if it was limited to 
> academic use?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN0qG-i1iT0&feature=youtu.be

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5ea97134.1c69fb81.8c167.2c68SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.

Reply via email to