A bit late I realise, but I figured I would throw in my 2c. We use Gentoo across the board as much as possible after moving from RH/Fedora.
Gentoo appeals to me in that it works out of the box 99% of the time for the common case, but can easily be changed to handle more advanced needs without needing to abandon the package manager. eg. A lot of distros ship bind without DLZ support (ie. loading zone data from a DB like MySQL). Gentoo ships without it by default too, but it's a single flag to turn it on. The binary package distros I've used would require you to install bind from source, external to your package manager, and hope to hell nobody forgets and installs the package. This is where systems like RPM break down IMHO; you're on your own and have to build from source as soon as 1) you need a newer version than is provided officially, 2) you need a package not provided, or 3) you need a feature not enabled by default. You now need to remember whether a package is installed from source or from RPM. My experience is that all 3 of those options is almost a guarantee with distros like CentOS where they are very conservative about pushing new versions out (for good reason, considering they are pushing the Enterprise aspect). Another thing I like with Gentoo is that I can satisfy deps myself (eg. ruby) and tell the package manager that it's provided already, and everything just keeps working (with no risk of someone else trying to install it over the top). It also pleases me that I can install ImageMagick without it bringing in every freaking X and Gnome library ever written (RH/Fedora, I'm looking at you...). That said, Gentoo certainly isn't for someone who doesn't have a lot of experience with Linux, or generally just needs what the defaults give them. Works well for us though. All the best, Jason On 27 November 2010 18:43, Mikel Lindsaar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi RoRoers, > > Quick survey, what is your current deployment OS of choice and why? > > Reason I ask is there is a lot of movement recently, my current deployment > OS of choice is CentOS, but it is getting a bit long in the tooth and > sometimes has interesting yum problems on updating software, I can get > anything I want installed of course using direct installs, but would like to > get a bit of feedback from our community on what you are using these days. > > For some reason, I look at Ubuntu as just a desktop OS, I know this is > irrational, but I have been seeing more and more ubuntu installs on screen > casts and the like, are people using this because they find it easier? Are > they (gasp) running the GUI on it in production? What is the attraction > here? > > > Mikel Lindsaar > http://rubyx.com/ > http://lindsaar.net/ > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rails-oceania%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
