Well, yes you are correct. I guess I was just alluding to the possible day in the future when a version of javascript comes that supports what we are trying to do without requiring the hacks.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Peters Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:25 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Status of Prototype Ryan Gahl wrote: > but the point is that some level of manual upkeep is > almost always going to be required in this new age of web development > until such a day as a good type-safe (and possibly compiled) javascript > VM is supplied to us by the powers that be. You don't need type safety or compilation to achieve what the OP is after. You just need real namespaces. -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs The information transmitted in this electronic mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
