On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:36:22 -0500 Chuck Holman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> I know, we are having trouble getting enough men to fill the
> postistions
> of leaders. Why couldn't we use Females. I see nothing wrong with
> having
> female leaders when we cant get the men to step forward and take
> responsibility for the Ranger Program. I know our church is not the
> only
> church out there were our of 2 or 3 hundred or more that attend you
> cannot
> get 10 me to work with the boys. What is wrong with this.
>
> These boys are our commanders, Deacons, and Pastors of tomorrow. If
> we
> cant get enough men to teach them one night a week how do we expect
> them,
> except through the grace of God, to take over the rains when they
> get old
> enough to do so. If they see all our men now just sitting in the
> pews and
> not doing anything they will think this is how it must be.
One of the best traits in our godly women is the ability to take charge
when our men won't. With Promise Keepers and Honor Bound I hope
this is becoming less prevalent in the AoG churches.
The drawback on this is that they have a difficult time giving it up once
a man decides to take his role in church and family seriously. This can
be more evident in wayward dads that finally realize these God given
roles
(i.e. Priesthood, head of home, leadership, etc), the women of the house
-
sometimes has a hard time submitting to this. Please don't get hung
up on the 'submission' word. Thanks.
In Jesus,
Will Marengo
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagh.
_______
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Eat the hay & spit out the sticks! - A#1's mule" RTKB&G4JC!
http://rangernet.org Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
