Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > I've been wondering whether whether just using one plain HTML document > for the project website might work well. Opinions?
I like the idea of keeping things simple. However, they tend to grow and need other bits. I was wondering if using the Apache CMS would be the best. Perhaps each specific product would use its own documentation system (e.g. some use Maven). Default being the CMS. > > Should we also have a concise description for each product, e.g. > > The Apache Creadur RAT (tm) software ... > > The Apache Creadur Whisker (tm) software ... > > "Apache Rat" and "Apache Whisker" would also be fine. Since these names > are simple and are already established, I'm inclined to stick with them. See the rest below. > We'll need to ship a "Apache Creadur" bundle containing every product. > > > I presume that we use a product's full name on the first mention, > > "Apache Creadur Whisker" and thereafter refer to it > > as "Apache Whisker" or just "Whisker". Is that correct? > > +1 > > Robert > > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution > > [2] > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/podling-tlp-resolution.txt > > > > -David > > >
