On 04/09/12 06:44, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2012-04-07, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:

Today, the podling website[1] is generated by Maven for Rat.

A CMS based[2] replacement[3] has been in staging for a while. Some
pages are edited using the bookmarklet (please feel free to jump in),
others are generated using Maven then checked in. (For rat use 'mvn
site:deploy -Pcms')

Should we switch to the CMS...?

I have just tried the mvn-based site, I changed a single page and had to
commit all Javadocs - I don't think I like this.

And it's probably not a great idea to continue spamming the commits list :-/

In general I'm not a big fan of mvn sites with generated reports that
are useful for the projects developers but not for its users.  Given we
only have a few content-pages in total (less than 20, I'd guess), I'd
prefer to manage them via the CMS and drop the mvn site completely.

As a user, I find having a full Maven site for each release is useful. This would only need one site checking per release. So, I'm probably in agreement.

Robert

Reply via email to