On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Anders Kvist wrote: > > > > Maybe some additional field in cache xml? eg.: > > > > <batch-queue>A</batch-queue> > > > > > > > > After processing there is added <exported> mark -> there is no > > > > problem to remove the batch sign then. The xmls are opened anyway > > > I have thought about it...but what should happen when rawstudio > > > quits after 10 images has been placed in queue and not exported? > > > They will look like they are in the queue..but are not... > > and it should :) Why in this case photo shouldn't be added to queue? > > How each photo is marked for queue? Some memory table > It still doesn't work right, what if you open an other directory. The > photos aren't added before the old directory is opened again...and we > are back at having a lot of batch dependency when opening a directory...
I think that I don't get the problem... You can add files from new directory to the list... Anyway - if there is real problem with closing/opening multiple directories you can always limit batch to the current directory only: - open directory -> clear queue (files are marked in xmls as batched)-> read xmls -> add proper files to the queue You work in this moment on the one directory only and it's easy to extend that to many derectories if there will be some better idea. Remember that in this scheme I can mark files to the batch and process them later, i.e. when the laptop will not work on batteries... (and this can happen after many, many hours or even days :) ). -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
