Le Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:00:59 +0200, Martin Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >>>>> "Trond" == Trond Danielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trond> A python interface would be awesome, and by using numpy/scipy I > Trond> do not think the performance would be that bad. > > The question of performance is relatively minor. I consider it much > more likely that a poorly performing but working plugin will be > optimised for speed than a new and speedy plugin will be written from > scratch. A low barrier to entry is truly priceless. Just make sure > that the API is simple and flexible. > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Rawstudio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev Hi everybody, Of course a plugin architecture would be a nice and great thing. I think the main API should be in C so that raw loaders do not suffer from scripting languages weaknesses (mainly speed). Then it will be easy to extend the plugins mechanism to any scripting language (should it be python, perl, tcl, even scheme). Regards, Ille _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
