On 2018-11-08, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:42:58PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> The unreproducible numbers include simply unknown things; packages which >> have no .buildinfo files available, haven't been (re)built recently >> enough to have a .buildinfo file, only unsigned .buildinfo files, >> etc.
> Could you please extrapolate which of those packages in the base system > lack any .buildinfo file in the archive? I didn't do any specific analysis; those were just the types of things that keep some .buildinfo files off of buildinfo.debian.net, and the process relies on the .buildinfo files being on buildinfo.debian.net. Another issue would be buildinfo files signed with ed25519 keys, if my hunches about this issue are correct: https://github.com/lamby/buildinfo.debian.net/issues/51 Which *might* be resolved by the recent update to gnupg in Debian stretch: https://bugs.debian.org/906545 https://bugs.debian.org/910398 live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list To change your subscription options, visit https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
