Why do so many of you value SS bottles so highly?  I've been using
Polar Bottles and like them a lot.
They're insulated, less expensive, no BPA, no flavor, you can squeeze
them, they don't rattle in a bottle cage.  Is there some advantage to
SS that I don't know about?  I'll admit they do look good.

On Oct 11, 6:10 pm, cyclotourist <[email protected]> wrote:
> I sent my 1L and 1.5L bottles to them, and they credited me $50 toward a new
> purchase.  Unfortunately that doesn't cover a direct replacement in those
> sizes, so I instead picked up the double walled stainless steel 1L thermos.
> That was $40, and there was nothing available for the extra $10 credit.  The
> thermos hasn't arrived yet, and it's been a couple weeks since I ordered
> it.  I presume it'll come, but it's not exactly a quick turn around.
>
> I used the 1.5L bottle daily, so needed something immediately and purchased
> a KK 40oz. container.
>
> The KK new sport-top 2 is supposed to be pretty cool FWIW.
>
> DE
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:01 PM, JoelMatthews <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Guess I should have returned my Sigg to Rivendell instead of to the
> > Sigg address.  Just got back from a week bike tour and found still no
> > news whatsoever from Sigg.  And yes, I had forwarded a request for
> > update before leaving.  I hope Sigg at least got the bottle to recycle
> > the aluminum.  Probably just stick with the Wall Bike bottles I used
> > on this trip.
>
> > On Sep 20, 10:31 pm, R Gonet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sep 20, 9:06 pm, Tim McNamara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 20, 2009, at 10:40 AM, R Gonet wrote:
>
> > > > >> Again, think about Rivendell having to deal with a recall on one of
> > > > >> their products.  They'd have to assign some of their limited staff
> > to
> > > > >> deal with that but would still be doing business as usual.
> > > > >> Everything would be slower- new order fulfillment as well as
> > > > >> processing the recall.  All the RBW folks would (hopefully)
> > > > >> understand this- because Rivendell is not a faceless corporation to
> > > > >> us- and cut them some slack.  We should do the same with Sigg.
>
> > > > > Companies like RBW, Sigg, Patagonia, and others trade on their
> > > > > reputation for quality, reliability, and integrity to earn our trust.
> > > > > When I buy a no-name product made in China, I know I'm taking my
> > > > > chances.  When I pay a premium to buy a product from one of the
> > > > > aforesaid companies, I rely on their reputation to deliver a quality
> > > > > product.   I'm not overly concerned about BPA but when a company
> > > > > employs deceptive practices, I think they don't deserve any slack.
>
> > > > Richard, you're obviously tweaked about this and we're not going to
> > > > agree.  Since this isn't a Riv topic, maybe it should be left off of
> > > > the mailing list.
>
> > > Tim:
> > >  I agree.  We've beaten this horse to death.  We should be out riding
> > > instead.
> > > Richard.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> David
> Redlands, CA
>
> "Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
> wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym."  ~Bill Nye,
> scientist guy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to