white industries stainless steel BB are nice, but they run sizes specific for their cranks.
otherwise, I would just get a phil bb (for adjust-ability), or an SFK (if you don't wanna buy extra phil tools). i've used shimano un55/75's and they are great bang for the buck, but do require frequent replacement if you're riding a lot in dirt/mud/rain. lately i've invested a bit more in parts and have become more of a "set it and forget it" type. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 4:27:49 PM UTC-4, dstein wrote: > > Why are more expensive bottom brackets more expensive? What do you gain? > Is it just durability? Or is there any sort of performance gain (ie, does > it roll smoother, faster, etc)? > > I've worked on most bike parts now minus the bottom bracket and headset. > About to change cranks on my hunqapillar form the Sugino triple (with a 107 > or 110 bb) to a White Industries Eno (with a 113 bb). Trying to figure out > if I go w/ the $40 bb on Riv's site? Or a White Industries or something > similar? This bike will see 500-1000 miles a year on dirt and some mud. And > support the occasional overnighter. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
