A 60 cm frame made of 8/5/8 for a rider at or slightly above 200 lb who
isn't carrying a huge load doesn't need a 2nd tt. Neither does a 58.5
cm frame for that same rider and that same load made out of 7/5/7 with
an 8/5/8 downtube doesn't need a 2nd tt either.
On 07/08/2016 05:28 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:
I think that the double tt is largely aesthetic; a 55 or 58 bicycle
for a rider not much more than 200 lb, who rides like most North
Americans (ie, doesn't carry 200 lb loads of paraffin tins, firewood,
fodder, or relatives) doesn't need a 2nd tt for reasons of strength;
after all, Rivendell frames are very well made.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
