I don't recall Rivendell ever quoting weights, other than a comment that the Atlantis is about a pound more than other frames (this was wayback when they had fewer models). My 58 cm Atlantis in stock Rivendell build c. 2003 was around 26#. Like happens to us all, as it's aged it's gained weight. Heavier rims & tires, racks, dirt, ???. Last time I weighed it was right at 30 lbs.
dougP On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 11:25:55 AM UTC-7 aeroperf wrote: > > I can’t imagine someone who wanted a certain Rivendell bike turning it > down because another model weighed a pound less. > > I’m just interested in what design choices have what results. Like the > step-throughs. How does a Platypus (mixte) compare to a Susie (swooping > top tube) compare to a Clem L (swooping top tube with brace)? And how > would these compare to a double-diamond of the same approximate fit? The > problem would be finding any way you could compare them directly. > But other than “only a couple of pounds heavier than carbon”, we really > don’t hear much about Rivendell weights. > > For myself, I love the Sam because of fit and ride. But I would be > interested. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b0e7bd10-9d76-42c8-95db-4e3105b34f79n%40googlegroups.com.
