On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Earl Grey <earlg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, and regarding San aesthetics, a year ago any discussion about fork > bend would have been utterly lost on me, but the sloping tt on the Sam > almost kept me from buying one. Now I think the San Marcos' fork is a > crime on such a nice bike, and the tt hardly bothers me at all. In > fact, I now prefer the aesthetics of sloping tt + moderate stem > extension to horizontal tt and 20+ cm of stem showing, fwiw. Though I > do think that matching the angle of the tt and the stem extension is > nice. > > Grant, any chance you can commission nitto to make a traditional quill > stem with a 6 degree rise? Oh well, didn't think so... >
Well - curiuously enough tange makes a lot of forks. You might want to look through their website - see if any of them would be the right fit. It could overlap nicely. A San Frame + tange fork. -sv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
