I have an old bottom bracket nut on the freewheel-side hub threads before the 
cog (14t in my case) which corrects the fixed chain line by moving the cog out 
5mm. Been running it this way for 2 years with no problems. It's smoother and 
quieter than the 16/19 on the freewheel side. I only run the fixed cog with the 
40t chainring.

Rob

On May 8, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Ron MH wrote:

> This question is to all. How does the fixed gear side chainline work
> out with the various combinations you use? I ask because the fixed
> gear chainline on my Quickbeam sucks and the drag/lack of efficiency
> is easy to feel. I'm running the stock bashguard/40/32 Sugino triple
> combination and a 16t fixed cog in back. The chainline on the 40x16
> fixed combination is more than 5mm off (the cog being inboard of the
> chainring). And the fixed setup is much more "draggy" than the 40x16
> freewheel combination on the other side when using the 16-19 White
> Industries DOS freewheel. Of course, that's because the DOS freewheel
> places the 16t cog further outboard. The whole issue has me about to
> ditch the Sugino triple in favor of a decent single speed crankset.
> 
> Ron
> 
> On May 8, 8:50 am, A D <deguzman.al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On my Simpleone I have a dos 16/19 on the freewheel side and a 17/19
>> surly dingle cog on the fixed side.  In front I have 44/48 rings on
>> the front.  I use the 48/16 when I commute and ride down to Rivendell
>> and change gears to 44/19 when I go back home which is mostly
>> uphill.   I usually flip to the fixed side on weekend rides when I
>> don't have anywhere to be.
>> 
>> I haven't tried the extremes of the gears but the dropouts on my
>> prototype appear long enough.
>> 
>> There is just something about the Qb/SO that feels so right.  I can't
>> figure it out but it has me considering picking up an AHH even though
>> I have an Ebisu AR.
>> 
>> On May 7, 6:54 pm, Robert Harrison <rfharri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> My QB has a 40/32 in front and the 16/19 in the rear. It also has a solo 22 
>>> back the which does come in handy when laden down with camping gear and 
>>> facing a couple of hills around here. In town I tend to run 40/19 because I 
>>> can get "off the line" faster in traffic. Once out on the open road it's 
>>> back to 40/16.
>> 
>>> Not thinking about what gear I'm in is great. During the week I'm in 
>>> commuter mode, on weekend it's open road mode and maybe once a quarter I 
>>> camp.
>> 
>>> Aloha,
>> 
>>> Bob
>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On May 7, 2011, at 11:00 AM, newenglandbike <matthiasbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> It is a cool concept, made even cooler, IMHO, by the copious length of
>>>> the QB dropout.   It's about 2".     So, whereas with the WI 'double/
>>>> double', you get to choose between front rings 3-teeth apart, the
>>>> extra length of the Rivendell dropout gives you a mind-boggling span
>>>> of 8 teeth to play with on the front rings-- and with the 16/19 in the
>>>> rear, you can make that up to 11 teeth diff up front.    Dang.
>> 
>>>> So basically, you can run a 16/19 in the rear, and a 40/32 double up
>>>> front, which comes stock with the new Simple One I believe.   Then you
>>>> put a 22t ACS f/w on the other side, and suddenly derailleurs start to
>>>> look quaint.*
>> 
>>>> -Matt
>> 
>>>> *OK not really
>> 
>>>> On May 7, 4:50 pm, andrew hill <neurod...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Has anyone run a White Industries "Double/Double" drivetrain setup on 
>>>>> their Quickbeam?
>>>>> Or maybe has plans to on their SimpleOne?
>> 
>>>>> Seems like a nice combination - rear Duo freewheel of 16/19, and front of 
>>>>> either 38/35 or 34/31.
>> 
>>>>> They suggest the 38/35 for a 26" mtn bike, and the 38/35 for a 29'er... 
>>>>> but it seems to me that the 38/35 would be best for a 700c mostly on-road 
>>>>> riding bike.
>> 
>>>>> Am I confused?  e.g. 38/16 and 35/19 seem like they would be better than 
>>>>> 31/19 and 34/16...
>> 
>>>>> Anyone try this yet, or have a thought as to why this wouldn't be a great 
>>>>> idea? :)
>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> andrew
>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to