I have a 64 on the way. At first I didn't like the "undertube" but it has really grown on me. It is probably/maybe slightly unnecessary on a 56 cm, but still looks great.
It wouldn't be a dealbreaker for me, but that's just me. On Jun 6, 3:05 pm, Bill Pustow <bpus...@aol.com> wrote: > It would be a deal breaker for me. > Bill > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Jay <robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Does this make any sense in a 56 cm Sam? Should it be a deal breaker? > > I almost ordered one the other day until I found out all the new one's > > have the "undertube". > > What does is collective wisdom of this group? > > > BTW I weigh 165 lbs want the bike for commuting and the occasional > > tour. > > > Jay > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
