Ba-dump-bump!
But seriously folks, a wider Q seems to helped out my IT band problem. YMMV etc. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Tim McNamara <tim...@bitstream.net> wrote: > Looking at the web site I see the DaVinci/White Industries Q factor is > listed at a whopping 158 mm. Jeez! A stance that wide would getcha > arrested at the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport. Hopefully that's just for > triples and doubles are narrower than that. > > The trend to ridiculously wide cranks is an annoying anti-ergonomic one. > I've been sticking with my Ritcheys (138-140 mm Q) for years as a result > (I've got a set of Truvativ cranks that are 140 mm wide too). > > Of course wide cranks are the consequence of stoopidly short chain stays > combined with unnecessarily wide cassettes with 10 or 11 cogs on 'em. I am > baffled by cranks with birthing chair Q factors as a standard. Certainly > there are people whom these cranks work well for, but there are a lot of > folks for whom they don't. Seems like it ought to be possible to offer a > range... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- Cheers, David Redlands, CA *...in terms of recreational cycling there are many riders who would probably benefit more from improving their taste than from improving their performance.* - RTMS -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
