To make both an American citation and recognize cycling prowness of
Eddy Merckx I suggest the Alferd Packer, a Roadeo sequelae.

ANDY
Pittsburgh


On Jan 7, 12:25 am, Leslie <leslie.bri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 6, 2012 5:19:36 PM UTC-5, Liesl wrote:
>
> > This is important.  I work with Native people, and appropriation of
> > culture by Euro-Americans without asking is just not a good thing.  Note
> > that the University of North Dakota officially discontinued its use of the
> > Fighting Sioux nickname the first of the year.  Sorry to get political
> > here, but this is such a respectful community that I feel I should pipe up.
> > -liesl
>
> Excellent point, with which I used to agree.  And, not that I completely
> disagree with it now, but my thoughts have evolved.   (I hesitate to say,
> but think I can respectfully do this, and it does relate, given GP's
> consideration of 'an Indian name'.) So, I'll give it a try...
>
> The community I grew up in near here is called Indian Springs (not the one
> north of Las Vegas); there were springs that the Cherokee used nearby,
> along the 'Great Warriors Path' (predecessor of the Stage Coach road, an
> extension of the Fincastle road, that became part of Boone's Wilderness
> road).  My elementary school's mascot was, to no surprise, the 'Redskins'.
> When I was a kid, we'd play cowboys and Indians, and it wasn't a bad thing
> to be an Indian.   When my father was a boy, he used to hunt for arrowheads
> along the stream near a known encampment site, that's a couple of miles
> upstream from where that creek flows past my house. We grew up with a
> romantic notion of what the 'noble savage' represented.  Today, my son's
> school's mascot is 'the Indians', and the middle school he was in that
> feeds into it, are also the 'Redskins'. It's a big part of the early
> history here.
>
> It wasn't meant to be disrespectful.  Over half of the placenames in the
> United States come from Native American names.  The word 'Indian' itself is
> being replaced with 'Native American', for the sake of political
> correctness.
>
> All of my ancestors have been in East Tennessee, southwestern Virginia, or
> western North Carolina since 1800; all were in North America prior to 1776,
> but some where still on the Chesapeake, or elsewhere on the east coast, at
> that time.  Of those that I've traced back across the Atlantic, I'm
> predominantly English/Scots-Irish/Welsh, with one originating from
> Switzerland.  The one variant:  my paternal grandmother's
> great-grandmother's mom, and her husband's mom, were Cherokee, part of the
> ones that remained hidden here when the Trail of Tears occurred; however,
> they remained away from what became the Eastern Band, and thus aren't on
> the Dawes rolls.
>
> Where I live, there aren't a large number of African-Americans, not as you
> have elsewhere in the country. There was one black student who was a senior
> when I was a freshman, and there was a freshman when I was a senior, but I
> never knew either of them.  However, there are plenty of people around here
> who are racists.  I really didn't know anyone who wasn't like me, a 'WASP',
> when I was growing up, and was actually afraid that, as odd as this might
> sound, that I might be a racist and not know it, at that point.  I went to
> Parris Island, wide-eyed and apprehensive; and that was where I first got
> to really know some guys that were black... and they were great fellows. I
> was actually relieved, and felt foolish for having felt as I did. But later
> on in infantry school, I met a couple of them weren't.  But the twist was,
> they presumed I was racist because I was a southern white boy, and thought
> I was out to get them;  the table was turned. However, there were plenty of
> other people who were great, too, and a few others that weren't, and I had
> the realization: people are people, and you have to take each individual
> individually on their own merits.
>
> After that point, was when I noticed rap starting a transitioning from a
> 'black-only' thing to a 'whites acting as black', is how I viewed it (I'm
> sure I was late to this, had happened elsewhere earlier, and, long before
> with other genre, but, I digress).  I frowned on such, not as a
> anti-African-American thing, but, that, other whites were being
> disrespectful of 'black culture', because they weren't reserving it for
> them.   I viewed it as, it was wrong for me to be part of that, of being a
> white guy listening to rap, not out of hate, but because I would be taking
> something from them.  [I can't say that I necessarily could have
> articulated that at that point, it wasn't a conscious philosophy, just my
> retrospective view of myself at that time.]
>
> But finally it dawned on me at some point along the way, that my view of
> that, was actually a form of segregation.  Not an active, but a passive
> variety. And not only that, but by allowing, even a passive, segregation,
> to continue, it could inadvertently allow (not necessarily for myself, but
> for 'people in general), a fertile ground to nurture an underlying racism,
> by having that segregation keep an understanding of other cultures from
> developing.  If you're a part of it, you're not going to throw stones at
> yourself; but if you're separate from it, it's more likely that you could.
>
> School teaches different things at different times, as society's
> perspectives change.  Used to, the Native Americans were portrayed as
> simple savages.  But at some point, they became the 'noble savage'.  The
> high-school level history began to teach you about 'European domination'
> coming in and shoving them out of the way.  But when you start to get a bit
> deeper in history, and look at the relationships that had developed among
> the tribes, the picture is so much more complicated.  The Five Nations, the
> Iroquois were the top of the food-chain in the east.  The Cherokee were
> actually a subset, had been displaced, and taken over the Yuchi's turf.
> The Shawnee had also been displaced, multiple times, and would go on
> hunting parties, to hunt Cherokee.   We were taught that Indians didn't
> have a concept of land ownership, which isn't really true... they knew
> who's turf was who, and they would knowing sell another tribe's turf to the
> whites, as a way to get back at the other tribes.  [I'm simplifying, but,
> I'm trying to get to my point.]
>
> The other night, I watched 'the Eagle'.  If you've not seen it, it's about
> a Roman centurion hero in Britian, who takes his Brigantine slave north of
> Hadrian's Wall to recover a gold eagle that was lost when his father's
> regiment vanished.  You see the interaction of the Roman invaders with the
> native Bretons; you see the highlanders; you see the 'seal people' who are
> reminiscent of Native Americans.  Throughout the movie, I was wanting to
> root for the Roman, but kind of had a 'politically correct' notion that I
> should root for the Celts, or the Picts, as if we were talking about the
> English doing the Native Americans wrong.   But, I realize:  I'm a product
> of all of those.   The Celts, the Norse, the Romans, the Angles, Saxons and
> Jutes, the Normans.   But not only them, but the Gauls, and even the
> Cherokee.    We just celebrated Christmas, but I realize decorating a tree
> and mistletoe are appropriated from Yule;  but, I'm descended from both
> sides of that.    Here, local rednecks like to wave a Rebel flag and claim
> it's not racism, and then there are historical people who explain that it
> was states' rights and not racism, but regardless, they're taking sides.
> But, my great-grandparents: his father, fought for the North, his brother,
> the South.  His father-in-law, the South.  I'm on both sides of the
> argument.  And by being on both sides, instead of taking sides, I can see
> reason, and fault, with both sides.
>
> My elementary school's mascot was the Redskins.  That's now a part of my
> culture.  By taking it from me, and saying only someone 'who is more Native
> American than me' has a right to it, is a form of racism.  Not in a,
> lynching, format, but in a way that is allowed to be tolerated in the name
> of 'being politically correct'.
>
> Our vision of history of chivalrous knights having tournaments is in large
> part fiction, but held to be a nostalgic time when you could ride in and
> save a lady; the same story told in the West, with gunslingers... sure,
> some people were shot, but, the 'Old West' 's reality was different from
> our nostalgic remembrance of it that Hollywood gave us.  Maybe the
> nostalgia isn't for the Old West, but the mental image that we remember
> thinking it was when we were kids.  When it was okay to be the Redskins,
> and schools weren't threatened with lawsuits or accused of evil for having
> an Indian in a Sioux headdress for a logo.
>
> I see having those bits of things pulled in, as part of an acceptance of,
> of them being a part of me, uniting us, instead of dividing us.   I'm not
> condoning a lot of the practices that did occur during Westward Expansion,
> and I wouldn't want anyone to mistakenly think I was condoning slavery of a
> race; but I think that we as Americans have at least recognized a lot of
> that and have, even if not head-on but obliquely, addressed much of it.
>
> SO, no, I don't think that Native Americans should be offended by such
> imagery's usage.  I'm sure that there are plenty of Native Americans who
> would disagree with that, but, I would ask them to consider if that would
> not be a form of self-segregation.    I don't expect anyone to feel like
> they have to change their minds to agree with me if they differ on this
> opinion, I can agree to disagree and continue on in friendship; but, I
> wanted to give pause to the thought that in the name of 'political
> correctness', that it would be bad to have an Indian name.
>
> Nancy Ward, Dragging Canoe, Chief Benge, Chief Logan.... can't say they're
> good names for a bike, but, I'm sure that there are some names that are
> great.  Geronimo might be overused.... Cochise was a strong warrior
> leader;   Apache is a name I like, or Commanche...      I'd like one of
> those as well or better than Rambouillet....
>
> Solely my opinion, for what it's worth, no offense meant....
>
> -L

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to