Indeed. My Kellogg / Spectrum 30th Anniversary is definitely the most comfortable bike I have owned. Tom Kellogg (who has a long standing relationship with Seven and consults with them on fit and materials questions) uses a crusty old Serotta stationary bike and a face to face interview to come up with the fit. I am very skeptical of precise claims such as '10% improvement in speed and efficiency'. Mindset plays a significant role in anything human's do, including riding a bike. Unless the laser fit people can craft a robot that exactly matches the human body for a before and after test, how can they say what part of improved output relates to the rider being happy with a new bike versus what part is actually related to the new bike itself.
On Friday, April 12, 2013 7:27:39 AM UTC-5, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: > Nobody disagrees that having good ergonomics can improve performance. But > is there a meaningful difference between the fit achieved by making > measurements in a low tech way, and the fit achieved by laser-guided body > scans? My BS-meter says the "high-tech" solution is no better than older, > less glitzy methods. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
