Renette Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>RD - I would actually like to see an option to describe the original and
>include the reproduction information in a note, as in the current LCRI
>1.11A, particularly for electronic reproductions.


Let's at least limit the option to first generation reproductions.
Attenpting to tollow the LCRI for reproductions of reproductions,
e.g., a print out of the electronic reproduction of a print item, or
the positive paper print of a microfilm negative of a print item, gets
confusing.



   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to